Blasté
|
|
|
|
| From programme
notes, Dog Eat Dog, by Stéphane
Lépine (translated) Roy Dupuis: Authentic |
||
![]() |
Handsome and shy like a Jeff Buckley or a Bernard-Marie Koltès, capable of setting the stage alight and of electrifying any programme by his mere presence, gifted with a disconcerting frailty, a wounded man who dares to show the sores and cracks, Roy Dupuis has become a magnetic pole of the Quebec stage and screen. An icon who is aware of his attractiveness and the power that this confers. From his first appearance in Jean Beaudin’s feature film Being at Home with Claude, we knew that this actor was not for those who wanted to keep their emotions in check. He took too many liberties for our temperature-controlled sensibilities, acted with too much force and shamelessness for our repressed bodies and souls. The dazzling discovery of Roy Dupuis on the big screen allowed us to gain some ground, but also made us lose our grip. For the first time in Quebec an actor exuded testosterone, stimulating a veritable media frenzy and intense feelings, a mixture of seduction and rejection. Theatre directors, primarily Brigitte Haentjens, have developed a fondness for this creature who is able to recite nonsense or, like Sarah Kane, can express moments of unbearable gentleness and spellbinding violence. Roy Dupuis revealed, through the works of Michel Marc Bouchard, Jean Marc Dalpé, Jeanne-Mance Delisle and Sam Shepard, the attraction of a moth for bare light bulbs, a particular liking for hostile environments, offering himself up for possible sacrifice. Like Genet’s tightrope-walker, he has shown that he is capable of making us feel dizziness and the alluring fear of the unknown. I understand that a French director moved heaven and earth to stage Genet’s Haute Surveillance with Roy in the role of Green Eyes, and abandoned the project when the actor decided to answer Jean Beaudin’s call to shoot the now mythical Filles de Caleb. Already, on stage, you felt that the actor had to a great extent overcome the fear of the unknown and of falling; on the screen his image stamped itself on the collective subconscious, like a branding iron searing flesh. Few debuts have been conducted with such passion and panache; there was more than enough reason to either adore or hate this actor who mumbled his lines, who radiated hormones, and who dared to venture where we will never go. Such disquieting individualism was both fascinating and disconcerting. Yet the unleashing of this Prometheus was only the beginning. I recall meeting the actor the day
after the American presidential elections. His anger and indignation were
intense. Roy Dupuis, born in the land of mines and Richard Desjardins,
loves America. He feels a growing affinity with the founding nations; this
aspect of the screenplays of Francis Leclerc’s Mémoires affectives
and Robert Budreau’s neglected and underrated That Beautiful Somewhere
resonated strongly with him. Americanism is inscribed in his imagination
and in his genetic code. He loves and understands Les États-Unis
d’Albert recreated by his friend André Forcier, but those religious
fundamentalists, those obtuse Republicans whose minds are closed to anything
that is different make him infuriated and bitter. No such thing as a
light-hearted conversation with Roy Dupuis, whether it’s about American
politics, the stupidity of the media, or cronyism in film, theatre and life
in general. His opinions are ones to lose sleep over and sound like a call
to order. For there is an honesty about him, this enemy of Puritanism and
pretence. With a dislike of pretentiousness, sworn enemy of insincerity and
corruption, Roy Dupuis stands apart from fashion trends, U-turns and
calculated manoeuvring, and says that he uses this craft to express himself
and to explore a part of himself. Roy Dupuis is one of those people that the writer André Suarès calls “les grands vivants”; those for whom the feeling of existing is only enjoyed against a background of permanent risk. He pushes the envelope. All his theatrical roles, all his filmography including his most commercial productions, demonstrate that the principal philosophy is excess, where beauty and ugliness, good and bad taste no longer apply. Roy Dupuis rises above these categorisations. The intention is not to convert; you have the right to choose not to go there, to go elsewhere for more moderate entertainment. Therefore it’s conceivable to steer clear of his work just as you may choose to pass on Sean Penn or Anthony Hopkins. But you need to know what you’re missing – a sort of wild vertigo, a compilation of extremes. Lots of people would like to own
Roy Dupuis, to lock him into a system. But the actor never lets himself be
caught entirely and hides well away from the money-grabbers. After the
global successes of his television series he could have been content with
marketing his image, by playing endless variations of Alexis Labranche or by
going off to Los Angeles where he would have been fresh meat for the
Hollywood ogre. But he preferred to remain a free artiste rather than
espouse the career presented to him. Even though it means paying a price.
Even though it means withdrawing onto his property and fighting for the
defence of our rivers as an ordinary citizen. For Roy Dupuis does not allow
himself to get involved in things where he doesn’t fit in. He will never
agree to being used to ensure that films or ongoing series are made. He is
less interested in the size of the role than in the quality of human contact
with the people involved in the project. |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
<< Main page |